<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is now legal to take pictures in public in the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/</link>
	<description>It's a First Amendment Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathanjk</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-18222</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathanjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 10:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-18222</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always been legal to take pictures in public, I don&#039;t get it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s always been legal to take pictures in public, I don&#039;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17678</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17678</guid>
		<description>I agree.  This didn&#039;t work for NYPD and I don&#039;t see this message changing things in the UK.  And the only reason this was released at all was the two BBC photogs getting harassed in the space of a week.

Never piss off a man who buys paper by the tractor trailer load and ink by the barrel.  Or the electronic equivalent thereof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  This didn&#8217;t work for NYPD and I don&#8217;t see this message changing things in the UK.  And the only reason this was released at all was the two BBC photogs getting harassed in the space of a week.</p>
<p>Never piss off a man who buys paper by the tractor trailer load and ink by the barrel.  Or the electronic equivalent thereof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbonini</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17674</link>
		<dc:creator>rbonini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17674</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;m going to print out that memo and carry that around with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;m going to print out that memo and carry that around with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long_Time_Reader</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17671</link>
		<dc:creator>Long_Time_Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17671</guid>
		<description>First off, good to see a glimmer of hope.

&quot;alienate the public&quot; - check
Sorry, too late for that, especially when people like myself are putting off travel to the U.K. for this very reason.

Came to post that this already happened with the memo to NYPD officers, beaten to the point twice over.

It was a few weeks before the next major incident in NYPD harrassing photographers after the memo right?  What&#039;s the odds for the nanny state doing it in a even fortnight?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, good to see a glimmer of hope.</p>
<p>&#8220;alienate the public&#8221; &#8211; check<br />
Sorry, too late for that, especially when people like myself are putting off travel to the U.K. for this very reason.</p>
<p>Came to post that this already happened with the memo to NYPD officers, beaten to the point twice over.</p>
<p>It was a few weeks before the next major incident in NYPD harrassing photographers after the memo right?  What&#8217;s the odds for the nanny state doing it in a even fortnight?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Workingindust</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17668</link>
		<dc:creator>Workingindust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17668</guid>
		<description>But during the course of the last year there have been numerous incidents of PCSO&#039;s and Bobbies going absolutely anal on photogs with no or very little said from the higer up&#039;s (&quot;isolated incident - it won&#039;t happen again&quot; they say). but it&#039;s only when two incidents happen to BBC photogs then the shit hits the fan and they go in to damage control mode.
Step in the right direction absolutely but as LWB said also, NYPD put out an Ops Order to the same effect but very little has changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But during the course of the last year there have been numerous incidents of PCSO&#8217;s and Bobbies going absolutely anal on photogs with no or very little said from the higer up&#8217;s (&#8220;isolated incident &#8211; it won&#8217;t happen again&#8221; they say). but it&#8217;s only when two incidents happen to BBC photogs then the shit hits the fan and they go in to damage control mode.<br />
Step in the right direction absolutely but as LWB said also, NYPD put out an Ops Order to the same effect but very little has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harley</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17667</link>
		<dc:creator>Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17667</guid>
		<description>In comparison to the NYPD, at least the bobbies actually do have a law to enforce.  And for all the hoopla, that law still exists, all that&#039;s changed is that there is now a memo from headquarters clarifying the circumstances in which a photographer should be questioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In comparison to the NYPD, at least the bobbies actually do have a law to enforce.  And for all the hoopla, that law still exists, all that&#8217;s changed is that there is now a memo from headquarters clarifying the circumstances in which a photographer should be questioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the lone white boy</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17666</link>
		<dc:creator>the lone white boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17666</guid>
		<description>wait... didnt NY do a similar thing? Yet NY cops are still using it to bust photographers&#039; balls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait&#8230; didnt NY do a similar thing? Yet NY cops are still using it to bust photographers&#8217; balls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Sidlo</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17665</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Sidlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17665</guid>
		<description>Wonderful news. I have a sneaky suspition that it won&#039;t stop a vast majority of Police officers though. But still I&#039;m very happy after the madness of &#039;Im a Photographer, Not a Terrorist&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful news. I have a sneaky suspition that it won&#8217;t stop a vast majority of Police officers though. But still I&#8217;m very happy after the madness of &#8216;Im a Photographer, Not a Terrorist&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Chamness</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/12/05/it-is-now-legal-to-take-pictures-in-public-in-the-uk/#comment-17664</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Chamness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=9004#comment-17664</guid>
		<description>No, naturally not. And yet it is still the right direction, which could lead to more. I&#039;d also hardly call it a tiny step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, naturally not. And yet it is still the right direction, which could lead to more. I&#8217;d also hardly call it a tiny step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

