<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oklahoma cop pulls ambulance over; puts EMT in chokehold while patient lingers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/</link>
	<description>Shining a Light on First Amendment, Media and Police Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:17:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Austin K.</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-17817</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-17817</guid>
		<description>As far as the whole rear view mirror issue. If the guy who commented on # 183 was a retired Firefighter/EMT I would like him to show me one engine or type 1 ambulance that you can use the rear view mirror, most of them come with out them because they are useless, you can not &quot;SEE OUT THE REAR, not to metion the window stickers on the back doors to keep the public from seeing something they don&#039;t need too. It is also a state LAW for vehicles to stay back 500ft. of the vehicle at ALL times, clearly marked, which in the highway dash cam did not happen. Further more, the whole running code thing, refer to the above &quot;PROFESSIONAL OPINION&quot; used as a nation wide corse of treatment above. The situation had nothing to do with speeding according to video, and if looked at again from the officer dash cam you can see when the officer gets right behind the ambulance not 2 seconds later in the right hand lane was a stopped white car, and i&#039;m sure that highway was not rated at a 40 mph speed limit. Pay carful attention when the officer goes to pass and the driver is able to see him in his side view the ambulance dose merge to the far right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the whole rear view mirror issue. If the guy who commented on # 183 was a retired Firefighter/EMT I would like him to show me one engine or type 1 ambulance that you can use the rear view mirror, most of them come with out them because they are useless, you can not &#8220;SEE OUT THE REAR, not to metion the window stickers on the back doors to keep the public from seeing something they don&#8217;t need too. It is also a state LAW for vehicles to stay back 500ft. of the vehicle at ALL times, clearly marked, which in the highway dash cam did not happen. Further more, the whole running code thing, refer to the above &#8220;PROFESSIONAL OPINION&#8221; used as a nation wide corse of treatment above. The situation had nothing to do with speeding according to video, and if looked at again from the officer dash cam you can see when the officer gets right behind the ambulance not 2 seconds later in the right hand lane was a stopped white car, and i&#8217;m sure that highway was not rated at a 40 mph speed limit. Pay carful attention when the officer goes to pass and the driver is able to see him in his side view the ambulance dose merge to the far right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Austin K.</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-17816</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-17816</guid>
		<description>First off this is the first time I have heard of this, next I have been a medic for 8 years in Texas. I do not know the laws in the state which this happend and so forth, but when it come to EMS it is preaty stright across the board nation wide. I have seem some comments about &quot;if it was a real emergency why didn&#039;t they use lights and so forth&quot;. Well from my from my professional medical experience and yes I said “Professional” we are trained to treat and “keep” a medical emergency from escalating into a bigger medical emergency. I will explain. When some one call’s EMS they feel they are having a problem, they get scared heart rate, blood pressure, and respirations will elevate. From what I gather this person was having a “heat stress” emergency, which if not put in check could lead to a “heat stroke” which will turn into “death”. One of the symptoms of “heat stress” if elevated blood pressure, and rapid heart rate. I do not know the age or medical history of this patient, which if she already had HTN, or some underlining heart condition with in conjunction with the “heat stress”, and the symptoms could have lead to a far much worse medical emergency. So us as “Professional” Medics are trained to keep this from happening and recognize the signs if they do. One of the “Treatments” is to keep the patient calm. One way we will do that is if, we can maintain this person in a stable condition we will not run “emergency traffic” because we all know because we do it every day, when some one here’s the sirens and see the lights we get excited. Now the patient will get excited thinking “well, I trust this guy to come and get me, and to save my life, so if he is using emergency traffic he thinks something is wrong with me. WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME? Do you understand what I am saying? Minimize what is already going on with the medical emergency. Now that officer if he would have thought at the time that this ambulance was in danger to him, themselves, or others he would have taken corrective actions right then and there. But instead as he passed the ambulance “which he should have had the snap to know, when you see one person in the front then the odds are good the other is in the back, and I’m sure he is not baking a cake” to respond to a situation that the “county” police were already handling who have had the same training as him I’m sure, and from the video under control. The ambulance passed by and he needed to get “his” in because he was unable to be of help to county. He pulls over the ambulance. Now I understand the paramedic should have chosen his words different but, and I say “BUT” I’m sure the medic who thought there was an actual problem was kind of shocked to see his driver was being threatened with a citation because the offer felt his situation was a little bit more important. Now if that was me and I was in my state I would have instructed my driver not to stop for this officer, got on the radio and notified dispatch and have them notify “highway” of the situation and we will deal with it after patient care is transferred over to the ER staff, however in the manor which this officer handled himself made me sick. I would hope this officer is aware that is he was to get injured in the line of duty dealing with real “criminals” it would be that paramedic who he grabbed by the neck his job to make sure he made it to the hospital not bleeding to death, going into shock, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, ect. WOW we are “PROFESSIONALY” trained to handle that kind of thing. So when that cop says you don’t “piss off the police” P.O.P just remembers there is always two sides “don’t piss of the Paramedic.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off this is the first time I have heard of this, next I have been a medic for 8 years in Texas. I do not know the laws in the state which this happend and so forth, but when it come to EMS it is preaty stright across the board nation wide. I have seem some comments about &#8220;if it was a real emergency why didn&#8217;t they use lights and so forth&#8221;. Well from my from my professional medical experience and yes I said “Professional” we are trained to treat and “keep” a medical emergency from escalating into a bigger medical emergency. I will explain. When some one call’s EMS they feel they are having a problem, they get scared heart rate, blood pressure, and respirations will elevate. From what I gather this person was having a “heat stress” emergency, which if not put in check could lead to a “heat stroke” which will turn into “death”. One of the symptoms of “heat stress” if elevated blood pressure, and rapid heart rate. I do not know the age or medical history of this patient, which if she already had HTN, or some underlining heart condition with in conjunction with the “heat stress”, and the symptoms could have lead to a far much worse medical emergency. So us as “Professional” Medics are trained to keep this from happening and recognize the signs if they do. One of the “Treatments” is to keep the patient calm. One way we will do that is if, we can maintain this person in a stable condition we will not run “emergency traffic” because we all know because we do it every day, when some one here’s the sirens and see the lights we get excited. Now the patient will get excited thinking “well, I trust this guy to come and get me, and to save my life, so if he is using emergency traffic he thinks something is wrong with me. WHAT IS WRONG WITH ME? Do you understand what I am saying? Minimize what is already going on with the medical emergency. Now that officer if he would have thought at the time that this ambulance was in danger to him, themselves, or others he would have taken corrective actions right then and there. But instead as he passed the ambulance “which he should have had the snap to know, when you see one person in the front then the odds are good the other is in the back, and I’m sure he is not baking a cake” to respond to a situation that the “county” police were already handling who have had the same training as him I’m sure, and from the video under control. The ambulance passed by and he needed to get “his” in because he was unable to be of help to county. He pulls over the ambulance. Now I understand the paramedic should have chosen his words different but, and I say “BUT” I’m sure the medic who thought there was an actual problem was kind of shocked to see his driver was being threatened with a citation because the offer felt his situation was a little bit more important. Now if that was me and I was in my state I would have instructed my driver not to stop for this officer, got on the radio and notified dispatch and have them notify “highway” of the situation and we will deal with it after patient care is transferred over to the ER staff, however in the manor which this officer handled himself made me sick. I would hope this officer is aware that is he was to get injured in the line of duty dealing with real “criminals” it would be that paramedic who he grabbed by the neck his job to make sure he made it to the hospital not bleeding to death, going into shock, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, ect. WOW we are “PROFESSIONALY” trained to handle that kind of thing. So when that cop says you don’t “piss off the police” P.O.P just remembers there is always two sides “don’t piss of the Paramedic.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-17298</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-17298</guid>
		<description>Hey whats the latest with this?   Anyone know?  Have heard anything in quite awhile</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey whats the latest with this?   Anyone know?  Have heard anything in quite awhile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-15354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-15354</guid>
		<description>If the ambulance had such a dyer &quot;emergency&quot;, why wasn&#039;t he running code, that would have really helped to defuse this problem? I am not saying the officer is all correct. Where I live if there really is an &quot;emergency&quot; that the EMT&#039;s are handling they run code to the hospital. If you are not running code you are still to obey laws. The video if you listen does show the trooper approaching with a siren, as for the radio remarks I could hear radio traffic, Martin may have indeed said something. Now at the stop, white should have kept his behind in the back of the medic unit, this would have saved a lot of time and avoided a mess. While yes the trooper seemed to have an &quot;issue&quot; with the driver when he got out, White had an &quot;issue&quot; when he got out. Look at the EMTs&#039; body language and you will see he was pissed that martin had the audacity to tell him he was wrong. I have learned myself that having an attitude with an officer does not help a situation. Also when a trooper tells me to get in the vehicle... I do it.

I agree with jim @ 183 they were both acting like an ass. Both deserve equal punishment by their employers for violations. In this case however, I do side with the trooper he had the right to initiate the stop, the ambulance not running code failed to yield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the ambulance had such a dyer &#8220;emergency&#8221;, why wasn&#8217;t he running code, that would have really helped to defuse this problem? I am not saying the officer is all correct. Where I live if there really is an &#8220;emergency&#8221; that the EMT&#8217;s are handling they run code to the hospital. If you are not running code you are still to obey laws. The video if you listen does show the trooper approaching with a siren, as for the radio remarks I could hear radio traffic, Martin may have indeed said something. Now at the stop, white should have kept his behind in the back of the medic unit, this would have saved a lot of time and avoided a mess. While yes the trooper seemed to have an &#8220;issue&#8221; with the driver when he got out, White had an &#8220;issue&#8221; when he got out. Look at the EMTs&#8217; body language and you will see he was pissed that martin had the audacity to tell him he was wrong. I have learned myself that having an attitude with an officer does not help a situation. Also when a trooper tells me to get in the vehicle&#8230; I do it.</p>
<p>I agree with jim @ 183 they were both acting like an ass. Both deserve equal punishment by their employers for violations. In this case however, I do side with the trooper he had the right to initiate the stop, the ambulance not running code failed to yield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-13659</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-13659</guid>
		<description>First of all, the trooper was responding to an office needing assistance pursuing a stolen car. 

Second, the ambulance was NOT running lights and sirens. 

The trooper was responding to assist a fellow officer when he came across the ambulance. Soon after passing the ambulance he was notified that the pursuit had terminated. He then had the time AND right to return to the ambulance for their traffic violation.

The paramedic in the back that caused all the problems could have easily returned to his patient and all of this would have been avoided. If he would have been truly interested in his patient&#039;s well being he would have kept his mouth shut, returned to the box and waited. 

Now, the patient was bad enough to transport her to the hospital. But she was stable enough to run code 2 which means no lights, no sirens. When running code 2 the driver must follow all normal traffic laws. Period. They must drive the posted speed limit, stop at all stop signs and stop lights, and yield to other emergency vehicles! The driver of an ambulance is just that; the driver. His job is to make sure that truck makes it to the hospital in a safe manner and the patient is delivered. 

How can anyone say there was no violation here? The sames laws that apply to ordinary citizens apply to police, fire, and ems when not running an emergency situation. If the ems crew had determined the patient was critical enough to justify ignoring state laws they should have upgraded to code 3, hit the lights and siren, and done things the legal way. Who in the hell thinks that the driver of ANY vehicle doesn&#039;t have time to check his mirrors?!?! That is just stupid. That is like saying he doesn&#039;t have to keep his hands on the wheel just because he is transporting a patient. That patient makes it even more important to observe all road conditions-in front, to the sides, and behind them!

Was this handled correctly? No. But it was not done right on either side. The trooper gave plenty of warning for the medic to get back into the truck. Most cops I know would have lost their cool after the second warning. 

Personally, I would have called for a second ambulance, cited the driver and hauled the medic off to jail once the patient was safely on board the back-up box. I am a retired fire fighter and EMT. Even when running emergency calls, we were only allowed to drive 10 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. 

In this day and age of everyone seeing dollar signs in every situation this was a lawsuit waiting to happen. The medic had a lawyer the very next day!! The medic acted like a jerk, broke the law, ignored an officers orders, and will now be compensated for it. Where&#039;s the justice in that? 

The officer who was a little cooler headed has had death threats to him and his family. What kind of idiots are willing to threaten the lives of children? 

This is NOT an issue of race. There was never any racial slurs being thrown around by the officer. The medic acted like a jerk and would have done so regardless of skin color. The trooper lost his cool and would have done so regardless. It should have never been any more than an issue of  traffic violations. If the medic had been white the news stations would have been done with this. When is everyone going to get fed up with everything always turning into a race thing? If you are an ass it doesn&#039;t matter if you&#039;re white, black, brown, purple or green-you&#039;re still an ass!

In this case, they were both acting like an ass. I live in Oklahoma and support our state police. As a retired fire fighter and EMT, I usually support ambulance crews as they are doing a very important job for very little pay. Not in this case. There were too many violations by the crew. I stand behind the officer on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, the trooper was responding to an office needing assistance pursuing a stolen car. </p>
<p>Second, the ambulance was NOT running lights and sirens. </p>
<p>The trooper was responding to assist a fellow officer when he came across the ambulance. Soon after passing the ambulance he was notified that the pursuit had terminated. He then had the time AND right to return to the ambulance for their traffic violation.</p>
<p>The paramedic in the back that caused all the problems could have easily returned to his patient and all of this would have been avoided. If he would have been truly interested in his patient&#8217;s well being he would have kept his mouth shut, returned to the box and waited. </p>
<p>Now, the patient was bad enough to transport her to the hospital. But she was stable enough to run code 2 which means no lights, no sirens. When running code 2 the driver must follow all normal traffic laws. Period. They must drive the posted speed limit, stop at all stop signs and stop lights, and yield to other emergency vehicles! The driver of an ambulance is just that; the driver. His job is to make sure that truck makes it to the hospital in a safe manner and the patient is delivered. </p>
<p>How can anyone say there was no violation here? The sames laws that apply to ordinary citizens apply to police, fire, and ems when not running an emergency situation. If the ems crew had determined the patient was critical enough to justify ignoring state laws they should have upgraded to code 3, hit the lights and siren, and done things the legal way. Who in the hell thinks that the driver of ANY vehicle doesn&#8217;t have time to check his mirrors?!?! That is just stupid. That is like saying he doesn&#8217;t have to keep his hands on the wheel just because he is transporting a patient. That patient makes it even more important to observe all road conditions-in front, to the sides, and behind them!</p>
<p>Was this handled correctly? No. But it was not done right on either side. The trooper gave plenty of warning for the medic to get back into the truck. Most cops I know would have lost their cool after the second warning. </p>
<p>Personally, I would have called for a second ambulance, cited the driver and hauled the medic off to jail once the patient was safely on board the back-up box. I am a retired fire fighter and EMT. Even when running emergency calls, we were only allowed to drive 10 miles per hour over the posted speed limit. </p>
<p>In this day and age of everyone seeing dollar signs in every situation this was a lawsuit waiting to happen. The medic had a lawyer the very next day!! The medic acted like a jerk, broke the law, ignored an officers orders, and will now be compensated for it. Where&#8217;s the justice in that? </p>
<p>The officer who was a little cooler headed has had death threats to him and his family. What kind of idiots are willing to threaten the lives of children? </p>
<p>This is NOT an issue of race. There was never any racial slurs being thrown around by the officer. The medic acted like a jerk and would have done so regardless of skin color. The trooper lost his cool and would have done so regardless. It should have never been any more than an issue of  traffic violations. If the medic had been white the news stations would have been done with this. When is everyone going to get fed up with everything always turning into a race thing? If you are an ass it doesn&#8217;t matter if you&#8217;re white, black, brown, purple or green-you&#8217;re still an ass!</p>
<p>In this case, they were both acting like an ass. I live in Oklahoma and support our state police. As a retired fire fighter and EMT, I usually support ambulance crews as they are doing a very important job for very little pay. Not in this case. There were too many violations by the crew. I stand behind the officer on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Moore</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12847</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12847</guid>
		<description>N</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dave</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12838</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12838</guid>
		<description>The police officer should have a better memory, since he&#039;s required to recite details of events in court, the paramedic has no such requirement.

Have you ever driven an ambulance, or been in one?  If you have the opportunity, talk to an ambulance driver about what it&#039;s like driving one.  Drivers tend to act very stupid around emergency vehicles, and with next to no visibility behind the ambulance anyway, it&#039;s very unlikely that he&#039;ll spend much or any time looking behind him unless he&#039;s about to do a lane change.

Regardless of whether or not the police officer or the ambulance driver made a mistake or even lied in their statements, the fact is that the officer had no need to pull the ambulance over in the first place, and illegally detained the paramedics from the point where the officer was informed that the paramedics were already dealing with a medical emergency.

The only legally permissible response on the part of the police officer, once being informed of the existing emergency, is to release the paramedics (and if necessary, accompany them to the hospital to place them under arrest or issue citations or whatever else is necessary at that time), and had the officer done his legally mandated duty, we wouldn&#039;t be having this discussion.

Add to that the fact that the paramedics didn&#039;t actually violate the law, which makes the entire traffic stop unnecessary in the first place,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The police officer should have a better memory, since he&#8217;s required to recite details of events in court, the paramedic has no such requirement.</p>
<p>Have you ever driven an ambulance, or been in one?  If you have the opportunity, talk to an ambulance driver about what it&#8217;s like driving one.  Drivers tend to act very stupid around emergency vehicles, and with next to no visibility behind the ambulance anyway, it&#8217;s very unlikely that he&#8217;ll spend much or any time looking behind him unless he&#8217;s about to do a lane change.</p>
<p>Regardless of whether or not the police officer or the ambulance driver made a mistake or even lied in their statements, the fact is that the officer had no need to pull the ambulance over in the first place, and illegally detained the paramedics from the point where the officer was informed that the paramedics were already dealing with a medical emergency.</p>
<p>The only legally permissible response on the part of the police officer, once being informed of the existing emergency, is to release the paramedics (and if necessary, accompany them to the hospital to place them under arrest or issue citations or whatever else is necessary at that time), and had the officer done his legally mandated duty, we wouldn&#8217;t be having this discussion.</p>
<p>Add to that the fact that the paramedics didn&#8217;t actually violate the law, which makes the entire traffic stop unnecessary in the first place,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jones</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12837</link>
		<dc:creator>jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12837</guid>
		<description>I hope he was paying attention to his driving, if he wasn&#039;t isn&#039;t that his fault?

The issue isn&#039;t whether or not they saw him because they admit they saw him they just couldn&#039;t pull over right away because of the car in front of them.

The bottom line is the cop and the EMT are both to blame. They both made bad decisions.

I was just simply pointing out the numerous contradictions between the EMT&#039;s report and the tape. I haven&#039;t heard any contradiction&#039;s between what the cop said and the tape.

I think I&#039;m done talking about this, this is getting old, I&#039;m going fishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope he was paying attention to his driving, if he wasn&#8217;t isn&#8217;t that his fault?</p>
<p>The issue isn&#8217;t whether or not they saw him because they admit they saw him they just couldn&#8217;t pull over right away because of the car in front of them.</p>
<p>The bottom line is the cop and the EMT are both to blame. They both made bad decisions.</p>
<p>I was just simply pointing out the numerous contradictions between the EMT&#8217;s report and the tape. I haven&#8217;t heard any contradiction&#8217;s between what the cop said and the tape.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m done talking about this, this is getting old, I&#8217;m going fishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dave</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12836</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12836</guid>
		<description>The tape shows that the side view mirrors were not visible, if you can see the mirrors, the driver can&#039;t see you using the mirrors.

While the cop would have had to approach from somewhere, assuming the ambulance driver was paying attention to his driving, he may well not have glanced in his mirrors in those particular moments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tape shows that the side view mirrors were not visible, if you can see the mirrors, the driver can&#8217;t see you using the mirrors.</p>
<p>While the cop would have had to approach from somewhere, assuming the ambulance driver was paying attention to his driving, he may well not have glanced in his mirrors in those particular moments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jones</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12835</link>
		<dc:creator>jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12835</guid>
		<description>You know he didn&#039;t drop out of the sky right? He came up behind the ambulance, with his lights and sirens. I would agree three feet is to close, too bad the tape shows that was a lie.

I don&#039;t think it was dumb luck, I think the lights and siren got the EMT&#039;s attention, although according to the EMT he didn&#039;t have his siren on, but the tape shows he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know he didn&#8217;t drop out of the sky right? He came up behind the ambulance, with his lights and sirens. I would agree three feet is to close, too bad the tape shows that was a lie.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it was dumb luck, I think the lights and siren got the EMT&#8217;s attention, although according to the EMT he didn&#8217;t have his siren on, but the tape shows he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dave</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12834</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12834</guid>
		<description>Jones, 

He was too close to be seen *by the driver*

It is dumb luck if the paramedic who was treating the patient happened to glance out the back window and notice the officer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jones, </p>
<p>He was too close to be seen *by the driver*</p>
<p>It is dumb luck if the paramedic who was treating the patient happened to glance out the back window and notice the officer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DDP</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12833</link>
		<dc:creator>DDP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12833</guid>
		<description>I know  you&#039;re not this dense, so stop acting like you are.

He was too close to be seen by the driver in the side view mirrors. He could be seen through the small window at the back of the ambulance.

Stop acting like a child. I mean, unless you want to be treated like one. I could break this down into itty bitty steps for you to understand...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know  you&#8217;re not this dense, so stop acting like you are.</p>
<p>He was too close to be seen by the driver in the side view mirrors. He could be seen through the small window at the back of the ambulance.</p>
<p>Stop acting like a child. I mean, unless you want to be treated like one. I could break this down into itty bitty steps for you to understand&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jones</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/05/28/oklahoma-cop-pulls-ambulance-over-puts-emt-in-chokehold-while-patient-lingers/#comment-12832</link>
		<dc:creator>jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=6697#comment-12832</guid>
		<description>So your saying he wasn&#039;t too close to be seen, I&#039;m glad we agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So your saying he wasn&#8217;t too close to be seen, I&#8217;m glad we agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
