Comments on: Bill would criminalize those who take erotic photos of seniors

By: R (not a Federal agent)

R (not a Federal agent) — Sat, 16 May 2009 18:31:02 +0000

Whether pharmacists are required to dispense Plan B (or other prescriptions they may object to) should be a matter between them, their employers, and their customers. It’s not a matter for legislation.

By: Ariel

Ariel — Mon, 11 May 2009 03:16:49 +0000

Well, this will certainly put a lot of mature and granny MILFs out of work. If only they had a union…

By: Anton Lee

Anton Lee — Fri, 08 May 2009 18:30:58 +0000

this is the same state that thought it was a good idea to ban Fluff. . . yeah the marshmallow spread for your peanut butter sandwich. (made in Lynn, MA)

this state, Massachusetts, is absolutely disgusting.

By: Nerdbeard

Nerdbeard — Thu, 07 May 2009 18:38:55 +0000

I used to hear about bills like this and laugh. But with the passage of the DMCA, PATRIOT, wiretapping, suspension of habeas corpus, etc… Well I just don’t think it’s funny anymore.

By: diomedesxx

diomedesxx — Thu, 07 May 2009 17:45:13 +0000

Better than what we face in parts of Texas: when advocating a certain house bill for this session, one of the House members blatantly said he didn’t care what his constituents wanted, he wasn’t voting for it.
(FYI, the bill would reclassify only possession less than 1 oz of pot to a class C misdemeanor, with no jail time. Free up resources in jails, more money from the fines, but apparently that doesn’t mean much to some people. Doesn’t affect distribution charges, etc. – just possession only.)

More on point, yet another case of a stupidly over-reaching bill. I can understand where they are coming from, but the language is much too broad and doesn’t have enough qualifiers.

By: genewitch

genewitch — Thu, 07 May 2009 05:14:20 +0000

i don’t know if i have the ability to get angry at representatives anymore this week, after the whole “pharmacists can decline to dispense Plan B” in Missouri; among other things.