Comments on: Who owns photographyisnotacrime.com?

By: MixItUp1a

MixItUp1a — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 02:40:21 +0000

Carlos as a fellow photogarpher in a large metropolitian city I have documented various abuses also. As we both know, the camera is a very frieghtening tool in the eyesight of some law enforcement officers, because it’s represent indefinsable evidence of actual abuse when caught in the lens of a camera. I m glad you have this blog to address the 1st admendment rights of freedom of speach.. I caution all photographers to be careful out there and always do what’s right regarding those pictures that expose the wrong side of the law in action

By: Voice of Reason

Voice of Reason — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:23:03 +0000

Note to Edwin: You said, “There is also the fact that Tuvalu is sinking into the ocean and will cease to exist in the future”.

Yes. When I double-checked my facts, I saw that. However, I didn’t mention it because the “.tv” TLD will most likely continue to exist. I don’t believe they’ll shut down a TLD that’s as useful as “.tv” (i.e., useful for television sites) when people are willing to pay thousands of dollars per domain name to use it.

By: Edwin

Edwin — Fri, 08 May 2009 15:04:08 +0000

There is also the fact that Tuvalu is sinking into the ocean and will cease to exist in the future. With that in mind, ICANN will stop supporting .tv domains as they phase it out. But who knows, because Soviet Union domains, .su are still around and they’ve been gone for years.

By: Voice of Reason

Voice of Reason — Fri, 08 May 2009 14:43:58 +0000

Note to Dina: You said, “photographyisnotacrime.tv
is available”.

That’s a Tuvalu domain. If I remember correct, they derive a significant chunk of their gross national product from the fact that their TLD is “.tv”. Unless things have changed, you don’t want a “.tv” domain. Those domains are expensive.

By: Fascist Nation

Fascist Nation — Wed, 06 May 2009 23:43:10 +0000

I can never remember Photography is Not a Crime for a blog name when I am telling anyone about this site, but I always remember CarlosMiller.com.

By: Duane Kerzic

Duane Kerzic — Wed, 06 May 2009 22:03:42 +0000

I’d get the .us domain right away.

By: Kat

Kat — Wed, 06 May 2009 20:49:52 +0000

Odds are it’s a cyber-squatter, unfortunately. Which either means paying the squatter exorbitant sums of money, or paying a lawyer the same in the hopes that you’ll get a judge to agree you have legitimate claim to the domain.

By: Lawrence Salberg

Lawrence Salberg — Wed, 06 May 2009 20:20:08 +0000

Usually, when you forward a request to purchase and/or contact to the proxy holder, they will forward (by way of obligation) to the actual domain holder.

You can also make some educated guesses at an email at that website and shoot off a few: (webmaster@, admin@, sales@, photographer@, info@, etc…) in the event you never hear back.

By: enhager

enhager — Wed, 06 May 2009 17:06:25 +0000

They’ll respond when you offer the right amount of money.