http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SB70mWXrzEE

BECAUSE THEY ARE (SICK) CONTROL FREAKS, AND YOUR CAMERAS THREATEN THEIR SENSE OF CONTROL.

“Here’s a bit of serendipity. I created an illustration to show why tennis players try to control the tempo of play. Lo and behold! that illustration has other uses!”

“For example, why did John McEnroe interrupt what by the rules is supposed to be “continuous play” for long periods, so that a match didn’t continue until he personally allowed it to?It’s all psychological control tactics. What are control tactics for?”

“Their purpose is to suggest superiority. It’s just a superiority act. The same as with your narcissist.

The purpose of control tactics is to create the illusion of superiority. Superiority is suggested by control, which is suggested by control tactics. This is a mental trick. You must allow the presumption for it to work. But our natural desire to avoid conflict tempts us to do just that, and controllers rely on it.

So, they PRESUME the right to control things they have no right to control (like your feelings and thoughts), and if you don’t confront the imposition, asking them who they think they are, you are playing the role of an inferior with respect to them.

So there — it’s not such a mystery after all.

Note that they thus steer a collision course toward conflict, while normal people try to avoid it. Narcissists don’t mind conflict. They use it. It’s a tool that serves them well, because we hate it and try to avoid it. So, they cross you with the threat of it at every turn. What do you think? What do you feel? What will you wear today? Whatever — the narcissist goes into Imperious Mode and acts like God mad at you for breaking one of his 10 commandments.

To avoid their wrath, you just let them have their way. Then brat is instantly all smiles.

Which is why they like conflict. They confront you with it (or the threat of it) constantly to control you.

In fact, what HUMAN being is supposed to have such rights with respect to us? The right to judge us. The right to determine what we may think and feel?

None, right? Those are (ownership) rights reserved for a god.

And that is why scripture calls letting others do this “idolatry.”"

http://narc-attack.blogspot.com/search?q=hate

In reading your post, and all the comments, you seem like a reasonable guy. I truly do hope things work themselves out to your satisfaction. Just what that satisfaction is, well that’s up to you. Maybe just having it behind you, maybe a 1st amendment fight – it’s up to you with how far it goes. The government is going to have their day, make sure you have yours too. At the post is over a year old now, how about an update on things.

One point I will add, the police employ “dash-cams” across the country. They obviously see the use in recording themselves and whomever they’ve pulled over for later use. While it might be impractical to have 100% coverage, ok, that would be near impossible, the use of some sort of open mic recording would not. At least then there would be a voice record of events. At the very least, our various governments in the U. S. have green-lighted the use of cameras for all sorts of law enforcement.

Let’s put the shoe on the other foot, if someone shot video of a guy beating up an officer, would the police take the same negative view of it? more likely they would call the person a hero and give them some civic award.

The police have every right to expect citizens not to hinder them with their difficult job, but citizens also have the right to observe and report of police activity in the public view.