<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silence speaks volumes for Amtrak arrestee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/</link>
	<description>It's a First Amendment Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: figMiNT</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-31857</link>
		<dc:creator>figMiNT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-31857</guid>
		<description>So it appears that in this case money talks. I have a question for those who were/are in the middle of a fight for their First Amendment right: If you’re truly fighting for such a just cause, as I hope you are, would you also accept a large settlement in return to keep quiet? If so, then your cause isn’t just at all. Greed would have won. Hear me out. 

If you are proclaiming that what you are doing isn’t just for yourself--that it is for other citizens, who are either afraid or ignorant, to stand up for their First Amendment rights-- then why would you be willing to zip up your lips for a lot of money?

Now if this was something more personal than a War on Photography and you just want to move on with your life, then I would completely understand your decision.

I dare those of you who are truly a part of the War on Photographers to say no to any settlements and make sure that actual violations of your rights get to anyone who will listen by any legal channels you have access to.

That’s all for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it appears that in this case money talks. I have a question for those who were/are in the middle of a fight for their First Amendment right: If you’re truly fighting for such a just cause, as I hope you are, would you also accept a large settlement in return to keep quiet? If so, then your cause isn’t just at all. Greed would have won. Hear me out. </p>
<p>If you are proclaiming that what you are doing isn’t just for yourself&#8211;that it is for other citizens, who are either afraid or ignorant, to stand up for their First Amendment rights&#8211; then why would you be willing to zip up your lips for a lot of money?</p>
<p>Now if this was something more personal than a War on Photography and you just want to move on with your life, then I would completely understand your decision.</p>
<p>I dare those of you who are truly a part of the War on Photographers to say no to any settlements and make sure that actual violations of your rights get to anyone who will listen by any legal channels you have access to.</p>
<p>That’s all for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schwartzmeyer</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-31827</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schwartzmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-31827</guid>
		<description>Has there been any update on or from Duane Kerzic yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there been any update on or from Duane Kerzic yet?<br />
<span class="cluv">Andrew Schwartzmeyer recently posted..<a href="http://andrewschwartzmeyer.com/2010/07/metafilter-quote/">MetaFilter Quote</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip -1" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://carlosmiller.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-11318</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-11318</guid>
		<description>I think it is a sellout on his part anything he agreed to should have involved a public apology from Amtrak. 

After reading all his posts on here I didn&#039;t think he would put a price tag on his silence. 

It&#039;s sad only way things will change is to keep things out in the open and talked about not hidden in a back room like dirty laundry.


Hope he has fun traveling the world taking pics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is a sellout on his part anything he agreed to should have involved a public apology from Amtrak. </p>
<p>After reading all his posts on here I didn&#8217;t think he would put a price tag on his silence. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s sad only way things will change is to keep things out in the open and talked about not hidden in a back room like dirty laundry.</p>
<p>Hope he has fun traveling the world taking pics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Murphy</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-9860</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-9860</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a confidentiality agreement fell into place. Settle the pending litigation and agree not to discuss the case. In this instance...they even got rid of the public record surrounding it. 

It seems to be getting very bad for photographers. I have some experienced about being harrassed by the officials of the MBTA, where photography is prohibitied. Once upon a time, they had a rule where the photographer had to get a photo permit. Inside of one year, I had been yelled at 4 times for shooting pictures in the subway; twice by either the inspector or the starters in the stations, and twice by the T police themselves. The last incident, which occurred at the JFK/UMass station proved to be too much...were my wife not present, I think I would have been hauled in. 

Now...I have a bigger camera that can&#039;t be hidden. I hope that&#039;s why there has been no harrassment in recent months; before, I used to walk around with a point-and-shoot Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a confidentiality agreement fell into place. Settle the pending litigation and agree not to discuss the case. In this instance&#8230;they even got rid of the public record surrounding it. </p>
<p>It seems to be getting very bad for photographers. I have some experienced about being harrassed by the officials of the MBTA, where photography is prohibitied. Once upon a time, they had a rule where the photographer had to get a photo permit. Inside of one year, I had been yelled at 4 times for shooting pictures in the subway; twice by either the inspector or the starters in the stations, and twice by the T police themselves. The last incident, which occurred at the JFK/UMass station proved to be too much&#8230;were my wife not present, I think I would have been hauled in. </p>
<p>Now&#8230;I have a bigger camera that can&#8217;t be hidden. I hope that&#8217;s why there has been no harrassment in recent months; before, I used to walk around with a point-and-shoot Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spokker</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-6165</link>
		<dc:creator>Spokker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-6165</guid>
		<description>Amtrak has updated their photography policy to the delight of the NPPA.

http://nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2009/03/amtrak01.html

Whether Kerzic had anything to do with this, it&#039;s a welcome change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amtrak has updated their photography policy to the delight of the NPPA.</p>
<p><a href="http://nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2009/03/amtrak01.html" rel="nofollow">http://nppa.org/news_and_events/news/2009/03/amtrak01.html</a></p>
<p>Whether Kerzic had anything to do with this, it&#8217;s a welcome change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Miller</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-5346</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-5346</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I checked out the New York court system online and his case had disappeared where I had seen it there in prior days.

I think it&#039;s obvious what happened and I look at it as a victory for Kerzic. I don&#039;t hold anything against him for accepting a settlement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I checked out the New York court system online and his case had disappeared where I had seen it there in prior days.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s obvious what happened and I look at it as a victory for Kerzic. I don&#8217;t hold anything against him for accepting a settlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-5341</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-5341</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know if there is a way to find out if there was an actual hearing and verdict either way?  Shouldn&#039;t there be a public record of whether the case was prosecuted, lost, won, dismissed, etc at the very least?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know if there is a way to find out if there was an actual hearing and verdict either way?  Shouldn&#8217;t there be a public record of whether the case was prosecuted, lost, won, dismissed, etc at the very least?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-5293</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-5293</guid>
		<description>I have to say I am puzzled by the silence...  I agree with Karl that this issue is bigger than Duane or even Amtrak.  It is a constitutional issue that should be contested in full public view.  Confidentiality Agreements are antithical to governmental honesty (is that an oxymoron?).  If that is what is at play here I am disappointed.  If, however, Duane is being silent due to ongoing legal maneuvering I wish him luck and ask him to speak up as soon as he is able.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I am puzzled by the silence&#8230;  I agree with Karl that this issue is bigger than Duane or even Amtrak.  It is a constitutional issue that should be contested in full public view.  Confidentiality Agreements are antithical to governmental honesty (is that an oxymoron?).  If that is what is at play here I am disappointed.  If, however, Duane is being silent due to ongoing legal maneuvering I wish him luck and ask him to speak up as soon as he is able.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDBreske</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/silence-speaks-volumes-for-amtrak-arrestee/#comment-5232</link>
		<dc:creator>PDBreske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4361#comment-5232</guid>
		<description>Money talks. 

This is what happens to people&#039;s righteous beliefs when the opposition dangles a nice, fat carrot in front of them. It&#039;s nice to see that the American dream of getting rich by suing Big Business is alive and well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money talks. </p>
<p>This is what happens to people&#8217;s righteous beliefs when the opposition dangles a nice, fat carrot in front of them. It&#8217;s nice to see that the American dream of getting rich by suing Big Business is alive and well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
