<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Headless Federal Reserve Officer is clueless about photographers&#8217; rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/</link>
	<description>It's a First Amendment Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:03:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-34285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-34285</guid>
		<description>Well lets see! 9/11, 2002 sniper incident any of these things kinda sound familure to you anarchists. Let the Government do thier job! There is a reason for the Law. I cite the National Security act of 1952 which infacts bans the photographing or scetching any Federal Property without the written consent of the Government. Live with it or maybe next time you visit as Government Building you could be the target of some sicko bomber type. This is for the Peoples protection!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well lets see! 9/11, 2002 sniper incident any of these things kinda sound familure to you anarchists. Let the Government do thier job! There is a reason for the Law. I cite the National Security act of 1952 which infacts bans the photographing or scetching any Federal Property without the written consent of the Government. Live with it or maybe next time you visit as Government Building you could be the target of some sicko bomber type. This is for the Peoples protection!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos Miller</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-9757</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-9757</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jake, I added the link to the latest federal reserve story.

http://carlosmiller.com/2009/04/14/federal-reserve-security-guards-force-videographers-off-public-property/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jake, I added the link to the latest federal reserve story.</p>
<p><a href="http://carlosmiller.com/2009/04/14/federal-reserve-security-guards-force-videographers-off-public-property/" rel="nofollow">http://carlosmiller.com/2009/04/14/federal-reserve-security-guards-force-videographers-off-public-property/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Kelly</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-9753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-9753</guid>
		<description>The below links tells the story of a recent run in my friend and I had at the Federal Reserve branch in Richmond.  We didn&#039; t argue with the &quot;officer&quot;, but I know the officer was wrong.  This seems to be systematic.  He did not get immediately out of his car but was on the radio for a minute before he came to talk to us, indicating he spoke with a superior.  

I wouldn&#039;t doubt that this type of thing is encouraged at some level.

http://www.danielcwarshaw.com/on-photography-and-seething-with-rage

p.s.  I do believe this is a violation of our constitutional rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The below links tells the story of a recent run in my friend and I had at the Federal Reserve branch in Richmond.  We didn&#8217; t argue with the &#8220;officer&#8221;, but I know the officer was wrong.  This seems to be systematic.  He did not get immediately out of his car but was on the radio for a minute before he came to talk to us, indicating he spoke with a superior.  </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t doubt that this type of thing is encouraged at some level.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.danielcwarshaw.com/on-photography-and-seething-with-rage" rel="nofollow">http://www.danielcwarshaw.com/on-photography-and-seething-with-rage</a></p>
<p>p.s.  I do believe this is a violation of our constitutional rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Skunk</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-5448</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Skunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-5448</guid>
		<description>You know, Duane, if they click that link in your email they will undoubtably see your comments and realize your devilish scheme.  Just sayin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Duane, if they click that link in your email they will undoubtably see your comments and realize your devilish scheme.  Just sayin&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the bulldog</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-5164</link>
		<dc:creator>the bulldog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-5164</guid>
		<description>(in my best homer simpson voice)...&quot;mmmm, cavity search!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(in my best homer simpson voice)&#8230;&#8221;mmmm, cavity search!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferfe LaBat</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-5136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferfe LaBat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-5136</guid>
		<description>Well.  You can take pictures but they probably put your name on some no fly cavity search list with terrorist suspects.  Just say&#039;n.  Free country?  not so much anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well.  You can take pictures but they probably put your name on some no fly cavity search list with terrorist suspects.  Just say&#8217;n.  Free country?  not so much anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Kerzic</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-5122</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Kerzic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-5122</guid>
		<description>I was certain I could take a photo and the federal reserve police officer was full of donkey dung. 

I just like to be careful and check in detail before I make an issue out of it. He was kind of respectful with his request. He made a joke out me having my people talk to his people after I checked it out.

Best thing to do is turn on the emails to the Fed Reserve asking about the photo policy right now. If enough people ask they might get the hint and fix things. I doubt it but I&#039;m an optimist. 

This is where you contact the Fed http://www.federalreserve.gov/feedback.cfm

Here is my last message to them which was written the same time I wrote this:
Hi,

This is my second request for an answer. Either something happened to my last request or it was ignored.

On Feb 5, 2009 I was told my a Federal Reserve Police Officer that I could not take photos of the NY Federal Reserve Bank exterior. Specifically the entrance to the building. I have a voice recording of the exchange for your review if you wish. He cited HR 217 as the law that prohibits taking photos of the entrances.

Then this shows up on the internet. http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/ 

Last I checked it is perfectly legal to photograph the exterior of all building when standing on public property such as a public sidewalk. It may or may not be proper when you are standing on private property.

Last time I asked these questions.
1. Are there any regulations, laws or rules in effect that limit photography of the exterior of Federal Reserve Banks.
2. Is it permissible to photograph the lobbies of the Banks.

Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was certain I could take a photo and the federal reserve police officer was full of donkey dung. </p>
<p>I just like to be careful and check in detail before I make an issue out of it. He was kind of respectful with his request. He made a joke out me having my people talk to his people after I checked it out.</p>
<p>Best thing to do is turn on the emails to the Fed Reserve asking about the photo policy right now. If enough people ask they might get the hint and fix things. I doubt it but I&#8217;m an optimist. </p>
<p>This is where you contact the Fed <a href="http://www.federalreserve.gov/feedback.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.federalreserve.gov/feedback.cfm</a></p>
<p>Here is my last message to them which was written the same time I wrote this:<br />
Hi,</p>
<p>This is my second request for an answer. Either something happened to my last request or it was ignored.</p>
<p>On Feb 5, 2009 I was told my a Federal Reserve Police Officer that I could not take photos of the NY Federal Reserve Bank exterior. Specifically the entrance to the building. I have a voice recording of the exchange for your review if you wish. He cited HR 217 as the law that prohibits taking photos of the entrances.</p>
<p>Then this shows up on the internet. <a href="http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/" rel="nofollow">http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/</a> </p>
<p>Last I checked it is perfectly legal to photograph the exterior of all building when standing on public property such as a public sidewalk. It may or may not be proper when you are standing on private property.</p>
<p>Last time I asked these questions.<br />
1. Are there any regulations, laws or rules in effect that limit photography of the exterior of Federal Reserve Banks.<br />
2. Is it permissible to photograph the lobbies of the Banks.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: genewitch</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>genewitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 17:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>Duane: the answer is yes, regardless of what any &quot;official&quot; says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duane: the answer is yes, regardless of what any &#8220;official&#8221; says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Kerzic</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2009/02/13/headless-federal-reserve-officer-is-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-5093</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Kerzic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 04:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/?p=4367#comment-5093</guid>
		<description>Yes.. take a photo of their face and name tag if they have one on.

I&#039;m gathering information on this. I&#039;m trying not to get arrested for a month or so. I was at the Fed Reserve Bank in NYC on Feb. 5, 2009. I was given a similar story. I got the guy to quote a law but when I checked the law it had nothing to do with the Fed Reserve Banks. I suggest that everyone go on the Fed Reserve Banks website and ask the question about if photography of the exterior of the banks is allowed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.. take a photo of their face and name tag if they have one on.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m gathering information on this. I&#8217;m trying not to get arrested for a month or so. I was at the Fed Reserve Bank in NYC on Feb. 5, 2009. I was given a similar story. I got the guy to quote a law but when I checked the law it had nothing to do with the Fed Reserve Banks. I suggest that everyone go on the Fed Reserve Banks website and ask the question about if photography of the exterior of the banks is allowed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

