Photography is Not a Crime

It’s a First Amendment Right

Photography is Not a Crime header image 2

Lawsuits expected to fly in wake of Repubican National Convention

September 16th, 2008 · 10 Comments

Republican National Convention coverage

rnc10
Photo by Nick Brooks

By Carlos Miller
Now that the multitude of journalists and photographers who were arrested during the Republican National Convention have been released, they are beginning to tell their stories on the Internet.

And it doesn’t take a lawyer to see they have more than enough basis for a multimillion dollar lawsuit. In fact, the city of St. Paul is already prepared to dish out $10 million, according to a California paralegal blogger.

St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman insisted that the RNC host committee use some of its private donations to buy police professional liability insurance to cover up to $10 million in damages and unlimited legal costs. It was a first-of-its-kind and, in retrospect, prescient move on Coleman’s part. It’s unlikely judgments will total more than $10 million, so it’s unlikely the city would have to pay anything. But it’s the kind of situation that brings out the lawyers.

But considering at least 800 people were arrested during the protests outside the convention, including more than 40 journalists and photographers, the question now is whether St. Paul will end up dishing out more than $10 million.

There are subsets of the arrested who might sue. Some were mere passersby, some were medics, some were anarchists. Another subset is the journalists, and they can be divided into two categories: mainstream and self-proclaimed.

According to media lawyer Mark Anfison, the success of the lawsuits might boil down to who is a journalist and who is not.

Who is a journalist and who is not? As recently as the last national party conventions that question was easily answered. Today, not so simple. With the advent of bloggers, You Tube and Twitter, the definition is fuzzy.

“Self-proclaiming journalists may have diluted the police’s capacity to distinguish between mainstream and other journalists,” Anfinson said.

Historically, the courts have sometimes sided with mainstream journalists because they were consistent and played by the same rules, Anfinson said.

“Does that same recognition continue to prevail if every Tom, Dick or Sally says ‘I’m a journalist but I don’t necessarily play by the rules?’ ” Anfinson asked. “I don’t think the courts are there yet.”

What Anfison doesn’t understand is that the First Amendment is not just limited to mainstream journalists. It protects any citizen documenting public police activity, whether it be bloggers, Youtubers and your uncle Charley with his new point and shoot digital.

Obviously, if these “self-proclaimed” journalists were breaking the law, which is what I assume Anfison means when he says “play by the rules”, then they have no grounds to sue.

But there have been no accounts of any of these journalists committing acts of vandalism during the protests, as a small percentage of the protesters were doing. Most of the journalists were arrested for unlawful assembly, which is a First Amendment lawsuit in the making.

And that whole confusion about not being able to tell the mainstream journalists apart from the “self-proclaimed” journalist is a weak excuse used by the arresting police.

Nick Brooks, who took the photo at the top of this page, is the latest photojournalist to write about his arrest. He is the latest of several photojournalists who ended up arrested despite showing police legitimate credentials.

There was no confusion. There was just spite for the media. An opportunity to teach them a lesson if they thought they were going to be writing about the ongoing First Amendment violations occurring in St. Paul.

Brooks wrote his account of the arrest in the Downtown Express of Lower Manhattan, took the photo at the top of this page.

The camera exploded in my face and I was trying to figure out exactly what happened, when a group of the black-clad cops ran at me from all directions, trapping me against the wall. Using their sticks, they pushed me to the ground where, with their boots, they pinned me. One cop took his stick and poked me repeatedly in the genitals. Another punched me in the face. The entire time I was yelling “Press! Press! Press!” but it didn’t stop them. They flipped me over, and handcuffed me behind my back so tight that my hands were numb in minutes.

I tasted blood in my mouth, and spit it out.

I kept repeating the word “Press! Press! Press!” over and over. Finally, a Secret Service agent appeared and ripped the credentials from my neck. He took my phone, called my employers and verified that I was, in fact, a professional press photographer. Then he left, leaving me in the hands of the Minneapolis Police Department. Taken to jail, I again identified myself as credentialed press photographer, but all jail officials did was show me to a cell.

Brooks was released two days later after paying $300 bail. He was charged with unlawful assembly and interfering with the legal process. He found it ironic that vice president candidate Sarah Palin gave a speech the night he was in jail.

Sarah Palin gave a speech, in part, attacking the media. I couldn’t help but recall my treatment and think that, as Republicans were rhetorically bashing the press inside the convention hall, their minions were literally beating the press on the streets outside.

Popularity: 8% [?]

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: First Amendment

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 genewitch // Sep 16, 2008 at 2:53 AM

    Who is a journalist and who is not?

    Anyone who wants to be. I don’t recall the first amendment saying anything about journalists. Free speech and free press being the basis of any democratic society, now that’s in there.

    stupidstupidstupidstupid. make it stop.

    I can’t believe that they treated americans, in america, like some fucking third world cretins in asia, where this crap is rife. They might have to put up with it there, where the phrase “gag order” means “literally gagging” rather than asking nicely with a veiled threat.

  • 2 Savvo // Sep 16, 2008 at 6:02 AM

    Genewitch, perhaps it’s just another aspect of an attitude that thinks ordinary people, merely by living in Asia, are necessarily cretinous?

    If Americans treated non-Americans with some modicum of respect, maybe the rest of the world would be as surprised as you appear to be to see this happening in America.

  • 3 Keith Skinner // Sep 16, 2008 at 8:43 AM

    The Constitution does not differentiate between “credentialed” journalist and “freelance” journalist. In the absents of a Federal Shield Law we must go back to the legal definition of a journalist -

    Anyone able to show that at anytime in their past they have been published by a publication with a paid base of subscription qualifies!

    Using simple math it seems that 800 arrest of this ilk could trigger at least half that many civil actions (or 400 plaintiff’s) that on the short end of the spectrum could add up to well over $100 million in awards alone.

    It seems the insurance coverage they bought will cover their legal fee’s totally, so expect these cases to be drug out by the legal team for St. Paul at every turn.

  • 4 Maz // Sep 16, 2008 at 12:07 PM

    It’s interesting to note that the RNC offered up 10 million in advance. Clearly they expected trouble and wanted cops to deal with it no matter what….

    What’re the ethics of hiring the police as your own private enforcers, more or less?

  • 5 Scott // Sep 16, 2008 at 1:41 PM

    Well no police force wants to insult a possible future boss do they? There are no ethics behind it, it’s just greed.

  • 6 genewitch // Sep 16, 2008 at 10:35 PM

    scott: when i said “cretins” i meant the police. Not the peoples of asia

  • 7 genewitch // Sep 16, 2008 at 10:36 PM

    s/scott/savvo

  • 8 Carlos Miller // Sep 16, 2008 at 10:42 PM

    genewitch,

    Scott and Savvo are two different people. Savvo was posting from the UK. Scott posts from the US.

  • 9 Savvo // Sep 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM

    Genewitch, I’ve re-read what you wrote. I suggest you do the same because it doesn’t say what you say you meant to say.

  • 10 OneByTheCee // Oct 25, 2008 at 5:54 AM

    According to Nick Brooks, he was SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY THE POLICE.

    How many other people were SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY THE POLICE in the same manner, during the convention??

    Maybe someone can throw that out there and see what sticks?

    Did anyone get a video recording of Nick’s arrest?

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled