<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Washington DC security guards clueless about photographers&#8217; rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/</link>
	<description>It's a First Amendment Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:55:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nuitnoel</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-20193</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuitnoel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-20193</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know why a DHS agent would prohibit an individual from recording his/her own responses during an interview?  Know any laws supporting the prohibition?  What about having two persons be present for the interview?
How about being denied these options and then the law enforcement agent actually lies about what the individual said?  Having the recording would have been a record of what was actually said?

Lastly, it was a DHS agent and the agency refuses to respond to the person&#039;s request as to why he/she could not record the responses or why the person could not have two individuals present for the interview since there were two agents.

Any one have some thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know why a DHS agent would prohibit an individual from recording his/her own responses during an interview?  Know any laws supporting the prohibition?  What about having two persons be present for the interview?<br />
How about being denied these options and then the law enforcement agent actually lies about what the individual said?  Having the recording would have been a record of what was actually said?</p>
<p>Lastly, it was a DHS agent and the agency refuses to respond to the person&#8217;s request as to why he/she could not record the responses or why the person could not have two individuals present for the interview since there were two agents.</p>
<p>Any one have some thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-19798</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-19798</guid>
		<description>Just saw this article. This happened to me about a year ago. I was photographing the ceilings. The ceilings! And this security guard comes up and says I&#039;m not allowed to photograph inside. No reason given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just saw this article. This happened to me about a year ago. I was photographing the ceilings. The ceilings! And this security guard comes up and says I&#8217;m not allowed to photograph inside. No reason given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Photography</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-3512</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 00:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-3512</guid>
		<description>[...] seems that this isn&#8217;t the first time that Amtrak has run into problems with one hand not knowing what the other was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seems that this isn&#8217;t the first time that Amtrak has run into problems with one hand not knowing what the other was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/06/02/washington-dc-security-guards-clueless-about-photographers-rights/#comment-991</guid>
		<description>http://lightboxdc.blogspot.com/ is the blog of the Fox photographer who shot the great footage.

Congresswoman Norton is getting involved now. This should be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lightboxdc.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://lightboxdc.blogspot.com/</a> is the blog of the Fox photographer who shot the great footage.</p>
<p>Congresswoman Norton is getting involved now. This should be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
