<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New video and copy of lawsuit provide more details on jailhouse strip search but leave more questions unanswered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/</link>
	<description>Shining a Light on First Amendment, Media and Police Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:47:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-18586</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-18586</guid>
		<description>Contacted John Boccieri today about the money he just got for the sheriff&#039;s office. Asked him to get new cameras instead and to see what he could do about the jail policies that they admit are still having men strip women &amp; leave them naked.

LETS ALL CALL!!

Be sure to point out this Sheriff is named in a LOT of lawsuits (7 or 8) and this crap needs to be stopped NOW.


Contact Me

I am here to serve the residents of the 16th Congressional District, and so is my staff.

We can be reached in Washington D.C.at (202) 225-3876, in Canton at (330) 489-4414 , or Toll Free at (800) 826-9015.



Boccieri District Office

300 W Tuscarawas St.
Suite 716
Canton, OH 44702
(330) 489-4414
(800)826-9015



Boccieri DC Office:

1516 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-3876


http://boccieri.house.gov/index.php?...=article&amp;id=78</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contacted John Boccieri today about the money he just got for the sheriff&#8217;s office. Asked him to get new cameras instead and to see what he could do about the jail policies that they admit are still having men strip women &amp; leave them naked.</p>
<p>LETS ALL CALL!!</p>
<p>Be sure to point out this Sheriff is named in a LOT of lawsuits (7 or <img src='http://carlosmiller.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> and this crap needs to be stopped NOW.</p>
<p>Contact Me</p>
<p>I am here to serve the residents of the 16th Congressional District, and so is my staff.</p>
<p>We can be reached in Washington D.C.at (202) 225-3876, in Canton at (330) 489-4414 , or Toll Free at (800) 826-9015.</p>
<p>Boccieri District Office</p>
<p>300 W Tuscarawas St.<br />
Suite 716<br />
Canton, OH 44702<br />
(330) 489-4414<br />
(800)826-9015</p>
<p>Boccieri DC Office:</p>
<p>1516 Longworth HOB<br />
Washington, DC 20515<br />
(202) 225-3876</p>
<p><a href="http://boccieri.house.gov/index.php?...=article&amp;id=78" rel="nofollow">http://boccieri.house.gov/index.php?&#8230;=article&amp;id=78</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17590</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17590</guid>
		<description>QUOTE &quot;I find it hilarious that you keep pestering these idiots by demanding answers and accountability. I hope that five years from now you are still reminding them of what they did.&quot;

I expected them to want to get the settlement done and think that would be the end of it. 
But that&#039;s not the way I play the game. 

I am trying to put even more pressure on them now that its over &amp; I post wherever I can.
And I am looking to get this spread over the net as much as I can, probably concentrating on the most popular web pages.

YouTube has MILLIONS of hits on this story, and I have posted ALL the video that I have gotten so far..(what wasn&#039;t &quot;MISSING&quot;!) HA!

I am also trying to figure a way to get the FBI to really look into this.

As for doing it for 5 years, I certainly hope not. I didn&#039;t want to do it this long...and I probably would not have except for the people at Stark County. They have turned this into an obsession, and not in a good way.

If I have to get professional help I may have to sue the Stark County Sheriff&#039;s office myself for damages.
If it turns into a class action lawsuit, I&#039;ll let you know....Hahhahahhaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE &#8220;I find it hilarious that you keep pestering these idiots by demanding answers and accountability. I hope that five years from now you are still reminding them of what they did.&#8221;</p>
<p>I expected them to want to get the settlement done and think that would be the end of it.<br />
But that&#8217;s not the way I play the game. </p>
<p>I am trying to put even more pressure on them now that its over &amp; I post wherever I can.<br />
And I am looking to get this spread over the net as much as I can, probably concentrating on the most popular web pages.</p>
<p>YouTube has MILLIONS of hits on this story, and I have posted ALL the video that I have gotten so far..(what wasn&#8217;t &#8220;MISSING&#8221;!) HA!</p>
<p>I am also trying to figure a way to get the FBI to really look into this.</p>
<p>As for doing it for 5 years, I certainly hope not. I didn&#8217;t want to do it this long&#8230;and I probably would not have except for the people at Stark County. They have turned this into an obsession, and not in a good way.</p>
<p>If I have to get professional help I may have to sue the Stark County Sheriff&#8217;s office myself for damages.<br />
If it turns into a class action lawsuit, I&#8217;ll let you know&#8230;.Hahhahahhaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17589</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 01:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17589</guid>
		<description>Lawyaman you debate nothing, you avoid the questions &amp; allegations that make the Stark County personnel look bad. 
And instead attack me personally. SOP for Stark County, turn the blame around 180 to the victim.

You want a chance to debate? Then go back to my other posts, where I put the link in PROVING what I say.

Lets make it easy for you...one at a time...

Try post 155. Dispute that if you can. 

LETS SEE YOUR PROOF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyaman you debate nothing, you avoid the questions &amp; allegations that make the Stark County personnel look bad.<br />
And instead attack me personally. SOP for Stark County, turn the blame around 180 to the victim.</p>
<p>You want a chance to debate? Then go back to my other posts, where I put the link in PROVING what I say.</p>
<p>Lets make it easy for you&#8230;one at a time&#8230;</p>
<p>Try post 155. Dispute that if you can. </p>
<p>LETS SEE YOUR PROOF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thank You, John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17548</link>
		<dc:creator>Thank You, John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17548</guid>
		<description>John, the world needs more people like you.  If any of us are ever wronged we should be so lucky to have someone like you on the case. Your dogged persistence to exposing the injustice in this clear case of over-exposure and assault for no reason almost restores my faith in humanity. Please, like others have said, start a blog on this!! Whatever you do, don&#039;t ever quit. I find it hilarious that you keep pestering these idiots by demanding answers and accountability. I hope that five years from now you are still reminding them of what they did. Keep nagging; that&#039;s the only way to reign them in so that there won&#039;t be any more victims of these violent perverts.

Thank You Again for your work on this case!

Don&#039;t ever stop your fight for truth and justice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, the world needs more people like you.  If any of us are ever wronged we should be so lucky to have someone like you on the case. Your dogged persistence to exposing the injustice in this clear case of over-exposure and assault for no reason almost restores my faith in humanity. Please, like others have said, start a blog on this!! Whatever you do, don&#8217;t ever quit. I find it hilarious that you keep pestering these idiots by demanding answers and accountability. I hope that five years from now you are still reminding them of what they did. Keep nagging; that&#8217;s the only way to reign them in so that there won&#8217;t be any more victims of these violent perverts.</p>
<p>Thank You Again for your work on this case!</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t ever stop your fight for truth and justice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyaman</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17541</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawyaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17541</guid>
		<description>JOHN--Hopefully everyone else who reads my post above will “get” my point.
I have no explanation of why you read it and don’t

You have no point to &quot;get&quot; ...your posts largely consist of disorganized allegations  that don&#039;t amount to anything substantive. 

I&#039;d be happy to continue to debate this with you, but please  try to confine your posts to making organized points based on  relevant information and avoid the name-calling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JOHN&#8211;Hopefully everyone else who reads my post above will “get” my point.<br />
I have no explanation of why you read it and don’t</p>
<p>You have no point to &#8220;get&#8221; &#8230;your posts largely consist of disorganized allegations  that don&#8217;t amount to anything substantive. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be happy to continue to debate this with you, but please  try to confine your posts to making organized points based on  relevant information and avoid the name-calling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17473</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17473</guid>
		<description>Support Hope Steffey and demand justice:

Governor Strickland
(614) 466-3555, Fax: (614) 466-9354

Senator Voinovich
(800) 205-6446, Fax: (216) 522-7097


Senator Brown
(202) 224-2315, Fax: (202) 228-6321


Congressman Boccieri
(330) 489-4414, Fax: (330) 489-4448

U.S. Attorney General 
 (202) 353-1555

Ohio Attorney General 
(877) 244-6446

Bureau of Adult Detention
Butch Hunyadi
614-752-1062   

Stark County Prosecutor
John D. Ferrero
Telephone: (330) 451-7897

Stark County Sheriff
 (330) 430-3800

Special Prosecutions Ohio Attorney General
Paul Scarsella
614-644-0729</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Support Hope Steffey and demand justice:</p>
<p>Governor Strickland<br />
(614) 466-3555, Fax: (614) 466-9354</p>
<p>Senator Voinovich<br />
(800) 205-6446, Fax: (216) 522-7097</p>
<p>Senator Brown<br />
(202) 224-2315, Fax: (202) 228-6321</p>
<p>Congressman Boccieri<br />
(330) 489-4414, Fax: (330) 489-4448</p>
<p>U.S. Attorney General<br />
 (202) 353-1555</p>
<p>Ohio Attorney General<br />
(877) 244-6446</p>
<p>Bureau of Adult Detention<br />
Butch Hunyadi<br />
614-752-1062   </p>
<p>Stark County Prosecutor<br />
John D. Ferrero<br />
Telephone: (330) 451-7897</p>
<p>Stark County Sheriff<br />
 (330) 430-3800</p>
<p>Special Prosecutions Ohio Attorney General<br />
Paul Scarsella<br />
614-644-0729</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17472</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17472</guid>
		<description>Lawyaman thanks for making my point about why it was a waste of time to try to explain anything to YOU.

Hopefully everyone else who reads my post above will &quot;get&quot; my point.
I have no explanation of why you read it and don&#039;t.

But I do want to thank you for trying to wiggle out of questions you don&#039;t want to answer, while trying to turn accusations against the victim in all of this.

Do you think people read your posts and gain any confidence that you authorities at Stark County are being honest?

For the people that haven&#039;t tried to contact anyone in Stark County about this, and so don&#039;t have any idea what kind of sleaze these people are, you give them a shining example.

Thanks

PS  How did you do on the Stark County Sheriff’s Quiz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyaman thanks for making my point about why it was a waste of time to try to explain anything to YOU.</p>
<p>Hopefully everyone else who reads my post above will &#8220;get&#8221; my point.<br />
I have no explanation of why you read it and don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But I do want to thank you for trying to wiggle out of questions you don&#8217;t want to answer, while trying to turn accusations against the victim in all of this.</p>
<p>Do you think people read your posts and gain any confidence that you authorities at Stark County are being honest?</p>
<p>For the people that haven&#8217;t tried to contact anyone in Stark County about this, and so don&#8217;t have any idea what kind of sleaze these people are, you give them a shining example.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>PS  How did you do on the Stark County Sheriff’s Quiz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyaman</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17471</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawyaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17471</guid>
		<description>Ok, let me get this straight, you are not comparing the Mary Beth G. case to Hope Steffy, you are just pointing out that in Chicago , almost 30 years ago, a &quot;policy&quot; was found to be unconstitutional.

The last I checked this post was about the Hope Steffy case, so if you are not comparing the Mary Beth G. case to the Hope Steffy case, then why bring it up here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let me get this straight, you are not comparing the Mary Beth G. case to Hope Steffy, you are just pointing out that in Chicago , almost 30 years ago, a &#8220;policy&#8221; was found to be unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The last I checked this post was about the Hope Steffy case, so if you are not comparing the Mary Beth G. case to the Hope Steffy case, then why bring it up here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17470</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17470</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t going to waste time trying to explain my post about Calumet City to Lawyaman, and I still won&#039;t.

But just in case there are some people that might have missed the point of the post, here it is.

I wasn&#039;t comparing the two cases from a legal standpoint, only to point out that even though Calumet City had a &quot;policy&quot; (doesn&#039;t matter what it was for), it was found to be illegal.

Stark County criminals are quick to point out what their &quot;policy&quot; is....well it doesn&#039;t matter WHAT it is, if its unconstitutional &amp; illegal.

So I am not comparing the same policies, only the same flawed thinking, which seems to be rampant in Stark County.

Just because they live in the fantasy world of excuses &amp; illegal acts, it doesn&#039;t have anything to do with the reality of what they REALLY did that night. 

And that&#039;s why you&#039;ll never see any of them take a polygraph, because all of their fantasies, pathetic excuses, &amp; lies won&#039;t stand up to reality.

Hope this clears up any confusion about shit &amp; apple butter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to waste time trying to explain my post about Calumet City to Lawyaman, and I still won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But just in case there are some people that might have missed the point of the post, here it is.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t comparing the two cases from a legal standpoint, only to point out that even though Calumet City had a &#8220;policy&#8221; (doesn&#8217;t matter what it was for), it was found to be illegal.</p>
<p>Stark County criminals are quick to point out what their &#8220;policy&#8221; is&#8230;.well it doesn&#8217;t matter WHAT it is, if its unconstitutional &amp; illegal.</p>
<p>So I am not comparing the same policies, only the same flawed thinking, which seems to be rampant in Stark County.</p>
<p>Just because they live in the fantasy world of excuses &amp; illegal acts, it doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with the reality of what they REALLY did that night. </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why you&#8217;ll never see any of them take a polygraph, because all of their fantasies, pathetic excuses, &amp; lies won&#8217;t stand up to reality.</p>
<p>Hope this clears up any confusion about shit &amp; apple butter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17451</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 23:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17451</guid>
		<description>Lawyaman there was NO RISK of suicide. 

If you are depending on the  &quot;manufactured&quot; evidence of Sheriff Swanson to try to convince anyone that she was suicidal, you might want to start with 5th graders.

Or maybe find someone that doesn&#039;t know shit from apple butter.

Because you people can polish that turd all you want, it STILL STINKS!

BTW how did you do on the Stark County Quiz?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyaman there was NO RISK of suicide. </p>
<p>If you are depending on the  &#8220;manufactured&#8221; evidence of Sheriff Swanson to try to convince anyone that she was suicidal, you might want to start with 5th graders.</p>
<p>Or maybe find someone that doesn&#8217;t know shit from apple butter.</p>
<p>Because you people can polish that turd all you want, it STILL STINKS!</p>
<p>BTW how did you do on the Stark County Quiz?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawyaman</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17417</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawyaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17417</guid>
		<description>QUOTE “Just Google Calumet City to verify this…..did you see the “subsequently declared unconstitutional” part???”

Apparently you did not

Of course I saw that, but it has no bearing whatsoever on the Hope Steffy case. You don&#039;t seem to  understand that, hence my comments.

  You don&#039;t understand that from a legal perspective,  a blanket policy of strip searches and cavity inspections of all females regardless of charges has no relation to  a policy of  clothing removal based on a risk of suicide.

 That&#039;s the legal equivalent of not knowing shit from apple butter. 

Hence my comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE “Just Google Calumet City to verify this…..did you see the “subsequently declared unconstitutional” part???”</p>
<p>Apparently you did not</p>
<p>Of course I saw that, but it has no bearing whatsoever on the Hope Steffy case. You don&#8217;t seem to  understand that, hence my comments.</p>
<p>  You don&#8217;t understand that from a legal perspective,  a blanket policy of strip searches and cavity inspections of all females regardless of charges has no relation to  a policy of  clothing removal based on a risk of suicide.</p>
<p> That&#8217;s the legal equivalent of not knowing shit from apple butter. </p>
<p>Hence my comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17407</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 03:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17407</guid>
		<description>Hey Lawyaman, want to take the 
Stark County Sheriff’s Quiz

When Deputy Richard T. Gurlea Jr testified under oath that Hope’s assault was not investigated because she was ‘unable to contribute’ to the investigation:

Would it be TRUE that any case where the victim is unconscious or killed is never investigated, or would this be a LIE?

When Deputy Richard T. Gurlea Jr testified under oath that Hope’s assault investigation was not finished:

Would this be TRUE that it was never finished, or would the incident report that shows Hope being charged with the assault, that she had reported, make this a LIE?

When Mike McDonald, the head jailer, said he knew of NO ONE investigating the Hope Steffey case:

Was this the TRUTH, or did the BCI investigator, Christy Palmer that stated the FIRST people she talked to were McDonald, Perez, &amp; Whalen telling a LIE?


When the sheriff’s secretary, Carrie told me that the “missing” video would soon be released to Steffey’s lawyers:

	Was she telling what she thought was the TRUTH, even after thousands of phone calls &amp; hate mail, or didn’t she know yet that the sheriff was going to claim the video was NON-existent, and she wasn’t let in on the LIE?

When the jail staff claimed Steffey was repeatedly “pulling away” from them and that’s why they never gave her a chance to remove her own clothes:

	Could this even remotely be the TRUTH, since there were EIGHT people restraining a handcuffed Steffey, and videos all over YouTube prove that this is a LIE?

When Sheriff Swanson said “all the facts will come out” after the Grand Jury investigation:

	Did he think he was telling the TRUTH, and he was just too stupid to know any evidence given to a grand jury can not be released, or after all his years as a LEO, did he know this to be a LIE?
(I guess the “No comment Tom” and then he hangs up on WKYC reporter Tom Myers sorta gives this answer away.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lawyaman, want to take the<br />
Stark County Sheriff’s Quiz</p>
<p>When Deputy Richard T. Gurlea Jr testified under oath that Hope’s assault was not investigated because she was ‘unable to contribute’ to the investigation:</p>
<p>Would it be TRUE that any case where the victim is unconscious or killed is never investigated, or would this be a LIE?</p>
<p>When Deputy Richard T. Gurlea Jr testified under oath that Hope’s assault investigation was not finished:</p>
<p>Would this be TRUE that it was never finished, or would the incident report that shows Hope being charged with the assault, that she had reported, make this a LIE?</p>
<p>When Mike McDonald, the head jailer, said he knew of NO ONE investigating the Hope Steffey case:</p>
<p>Was this the TRUTH, or did the BCI investigator, Christy Palmer that stated the FIRST people she talked to were McDonald, Perez, &amp; Whalen telling a LIE?</p>
<p>When the sheriff’s secretary, Carrie told me that the “missing” video would soon be released to Steffey’s lawyers:</p>
<p>	Was she telling what she thought was the TRUTH, even after thousands of phone calls &amp; hate mail, or didn’t she know yet that the sheriff was going to claim the video was NON-existent, and she wasn’t let in on the LIE?</p>
<p>When the jail staff claimed Steffey was repeatedly “pulling away” from them and that’s why they never gave her a chance to remove her own clothes:</p>
<p>	Could this even remotely be the TRUTH, since there were EIGHT people restraining a handcuffed Steffey, and videos all over YouTube prove that this is a LIE?</p>
<p>When Sheriff Swanson said “all the facts will come out” after the Grand Jury investigation:</p>
<p>	Did he think he was telling the TRUTH, and he was just too stupid to know any evidence given to a grand jury can not be released, or after all his years as a LEO, did he know this to be a LIE?<br />
(I guess the “No comment Tom” and then he hangs up on WKYC reporter Tom Myers sorta gives this answer away.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17406</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 02:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carlosmiller.com/2008/02/04/new-video-and-copy-of-lawsuit-provide-more-details-on-the-stark-county-incident-but-more-questions-as-well/#comment-17406</guid>
		<description>Lawyaman, could you tell me WHERE I said it was &quot;applicable to the case of Hope Steffy&quot;??

Apparently you didn&#039;t read the post, or didn&#039;t understand it, or being one of the Stark County criminals, you are used to twisting anything around.

Plus you posted the cities argument as to why they committed their criminal acts, but in true Stark County fashion fail to mention the millions that were paid out in settlements for their &quot;policy&quot; that was found to be ILLEGAL. (And then you point out that men were not subject to the same &quot;policy&quot;, and I have no idea why you would do that, unless it&#039;s to look even more foolish than before.) 

I am used to having Stark County try that trick on me too. 
Its just not as successful on me as it was when they did it to Hope Steffey.

QUOTE &quot;Just Google Calumet City to verify this…..did you see the “subsequently declared unconstitutional” part???&quot;

Apparently you did not.

QUOTE &quot;2. John, having no interest in the truth, deliberately posts misinformation.&quot;

I have already posted links to PROVE everything I have claimed...unlike the Stark County criminals. 

Next time instead of attacking me &amp; my posts/links, just post your own &quot;proof&quot;. It might make you more believable.

Plus I will volunteer to take a polygraph right along side any any of them to prove what I allege. See how many takers you get from them.

OOPS, forgot...you ARE one of them...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawyaman, could you tell me WHERE I said it was &#8220;applicable to the case of Hope Steffy&#8221;??</p>
<p>Apparently you didn&#8217;t read the post, or didn&#8217;t understand it, or being one of the Stark County criminals, you are used to twisting anything around.</p>
<p>Plus you posted the cities argument as to why they committed their criminal acts, but in true Stark County fashion fail to mention the millions that were paid out in settlements for their &#8220;policy&#8221; that was found to be ILLEGAL. (And then you point out that men were not subject to the same &#8220;policy&#8221;, and I have no idea why you would do that, unless it&#8217;s to look even more foolish than before.) </p>
<p>I am used to having Stark County try that trick on me too.<br />
Its just not as successful on me as it was when they did it to Hope Steffey.</p>
<p>QUOTE &#8220;Just Google Calumet City to verify this…..did you see the “subsequently declared unconstitutional” part???&#8221;</p>
<p>Apparently you did not.</p>
<p>QUOTE &#8220;2. John, having no interest in the truth, deliberately posts misinformation.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have already posted links to PROVE everything I have claimed&#8230;unlike the Stark County criminals. </p>
<p>Next time instead of attacking me &amp; my posts/links, just post your own &#8220;proof&#8221;. It might make you more believable.</p>
<p>Plus I will volunteer to take a polygraph right along side any any of them to prove what I allege. See how many takers you get from them.</p>
<p>OOPS, forgot&#8230;you ARE one of them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
